Raise your game. Sign up now!
Read more first




Search iStadia Blogs:

To What Extent is Cheating Justified - Thierry Henry and the Ireland France Football Match

Views: 488 | 0 people like this | Print | | Flag
AddThis Social Bookmark Button
I was watching the Ireland France world cup qualifier last night and looking to the Irish to create an upset. However it was completely overshadowed by a blatant piece of cheating. It wasn't innocuous either.

Ireland were the better team and were leading 1-0 in France which having lost the first leg in Ireland had them heading for a penalyt shoot out. In extra time the great Thierry Henry handled the ball not once but twice to ensure he controlled the ball close to the touch line and not far from an Irish goal post. It was enough for him to put in a low cross to William Gallas who headed in from less than two yards. This was blatant cheating and it wasn't seen by the refereee or his assistant. This has robbed Ireland of an equitable chance of qualifying for the World Cup finals in South Africa. And the great Thierry Henry was the culprit.

Was he justified in trying to do this hoping that if he got away with it, which he did, it would virtually put France through to the finals, which it also did. This was a disgrace. Henry should be villified for his cheating but if the lauding of Maradona's 'hand of God' actions are anything to go by, this twisted sense of moralitty will see him seen as a hero. I hope not. He has certainly gone down hugely in my estimation.

If ever there was a need for the use of technology or simply allowing the fourth official to view the video footage, this must be it.

From a commercial point of view, does this damage Thierry Henry as a brand and an investment property? What does Gillette think of him now?

Keith

Keith Irving
iStadia
Tags: cheating in football, gillette, hand of god, ireland france world cup football match, maradona, sports branding, thierry henry, william gallas, world cup football, world cup soccer, world cup
Posted November 19, 2009 at 4:35 AM by keithirving | Permalink | Comments(3)

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Comments

I didn't see the incident, but it is clear from the outcry that it was pretty blatant. I don't think cheating can ever be justified. However, the lines can be blurred between cheating and gamesmanship, which pushes the rules to their limits. Handball is not gamesmanship. While we can't justify cheating, whatever the stakes, it is easier to understand it and therefore to me the focus of attention should not be on whether Henry was right or wrong (that's clear) but whether the correct mechanisms (including sanction) are in place to support the referee - both on the day and in retrospect.

--
Rob Robson
Co-founder, iStadia.com
Rob Robson on Twitter
Posted by robrobson | November 19, 2009 at 6:58 AM
Calls for a replay are building which I think is hardly likely though I would support it and it would set a precedent. Could this be the straw that breaks the camel's back with regard to retrospective decisions using technology after all players can now be red carded after a game has finished. It's only a matter of time?

Keith

Keith Irving
iStadia
Posted by keithirving | November 19, 2009 at 7:37 AM
From PRweek.com.
However, despite the negative press, Synergy Sponsorship director of comms Stephanie Branston said: ‘The Thierry Henry brand is not irreversibly damaged. His value to sponsors will not suffer in the long-term although I would not envisage too many Irish companies beating down the door of Henry's agent this week offering brand endorsements.'
She added: ‘As a role model to millions and a footballer who was widely perceived to demonstrate true sporting values, his biggest crime was missing the opportunity to right a wrong and show genuine sportsmanship on the pitch immediately after the incident. His reputation may forever be tarnished on public record by that decision but his commercial value, as one of the most dazzling players of his generation, will hold firm.'
The sports pages of the national papers have all led with the story for a second day running. The Guardian also featured the story on the front page with the headline: ‘Hands-on Henry becomes public enemy numéro un.'
Threepipe co-founder Eddie May concurred with Branston and said: ‘Thierry Henry has had a reputation of being one of the most sporting players. He has a good reputation in England as a fair player and a nice guy. His image and brand will not be affected in the long-term. He doesn't play in England now and it will quickly be forgotten.'
Gillette has vowed to stand by its sponsorship of the star following the controversy. Brand communications manager of Procter & Gamble grooming James Nunn told PRWeek: ‘We are distanced from what happens on the pitch. We are not in a position to comment on refereeing decisions and they allowed the goal to stand.'

Keith

Keith Irving
iStadia
Posted by keithirving | November 20, 2009 at 6:33 AM

Post A Comment

You need to be signed into istadia.com to post comments

If you are not a member yet, registering is quick and easy! Click here for Quick Registration and keep up to date with what is happening, engage in some networking and access to iStadia’s expert community.

However if you are a sport & exercise professional or business and would like to promote yourself by building a detailed, search-engine friendly profile and posting content to attract potential clients, customers or employers, we recommend Full Registration.

Members login.

Online UK Job Search | CV Preview
Clicky Web Analytics