Winning Olympic Gold With Sport Science
From: Winning Olympic Gold With Sport Science
Sports Are 80 Percent Mental
Its
something that every coach and every athlete of every sport is
searching for... the EDGE. That one training tip, equipment
improvement, mental preparation or tactical insight that will tip the
game towards them. The body of knowledge that exists today in each
sport is assumed, with each competitor expected to at least be aware of
the history, beliefs and traditions of their individual sport. But, if
each team is starting with the same set of information then the team
that takes the next step by applying new research and ideas will
capture the edge.
To me, that is what sport science is all
about. The goal is to improve sports performance by imagining,
analyzing, experimenting, testing, documenting and training new methods
to coaches and athletes.
You might have seen a great article in the 6/23 edition of USA Today; "In hunt for Olympic gold, techies are major players" by Jodi Upton. We meet Peter Vint, a "sport technologist" in the Performance Technology Division of the US Olympic Training Center
in Colorado Springs, CO, whose job it is to find ways to win more gold
medals. From the article; "The next revolution, Vint says, is breaking
down the last secrets of elite athletes: response time, how they read
the field and other players — everything that goes into the vision,
perception and split-second decision-making of an athlete. 'We've
always looked at that as mysterious, something that's unmeasurable and
innate,' Vint says. 'But we think it can be taught.'"
Interestingly,
Vint cites another pioneer in evidence-based sports coaching, Oakland
A's general manager, Billy Beane. "We're becoming progressively more
data-driven," Vint says of the center's training efforts. "We are
trying to pursue what Sabermetrics and Billy Beane did for baseball,
identifying factors that can truly influence performance." The radical
concept that Beane created, as documented in the bestseller, "Moneyball" by Michael Lewis,
is to stop searching for "the edge" in all the same places that
everyone else is looking. Instead, he started from scratch with new
logic about the objectives of the game of baseball itself and built
metrics that gave new insight into the types of players and skill sets
that he should acquire for his team.
If sport science is going
to thrive and be accepted, it faces the challenge of inertia. The ideas
and techniques that are the product of sport science can also be
captured in the phrase, "evidence based coaching". Just as evidence
based medicine has slowly found its place in the physician's exam room,
the coaching profession is just beginning to trust the research.
Traditionally, "belief based coaching" has been the philosophy favored
in the clubhouse. Training drills, tactical plans, player selection and
player development has been guided by ideas and concepts that have been
handed down from one generation of coaches to the next. Most of these
beliefs are valid and have been proven on the field through many years
of trial and error. Subjecting these beliefs to scientific research may
not produce conclusions any different than what coaching lore tells us.
But, today's coaches and athletes see the competition creeping closer
to them in all aspects, so they are now willing to at least listen to
the scientists. Beane likens it to financial analysis and the stock
market. The assumption is that all information is known by all. But, if
someone can find a ratio or a statistic or make an industry insight
that no one has considered, then they own the competitive advantage; at
least until this new information is made public.
It takes time,
though, to amass enough data to convince a head coach to change years
of habits for the unknown. Reputations and championships are on the
line, so the changes sometimes need to be implemented slowly. Vint
describes the gradual process of converting U.S. hurdler Terrence
Trammell and his coach to some of his ideas. "The relationship between
the athletes and sports scientist is critical," Vint says. "But (for
some), biomechanics has not yet provided useful enough suggestions."
There still is debate on evidence based coaching vs. belief based coaching. Here are two opposing opinions; evidence-based: "The Second Law of Thermodynamics" by Brent S. Rushall of San Diego State University
and belief-based: "Evidence Based vs. Belief Based Coaching" by Richard Todd of Webball.com. If you have a few minutes, please read each opinion and offer your take on this. After considering these opinions, Robert Robson,
sport psychologist and management consultant, stated, "Sports coaching
should absolutely be evidence-based, but any argument that places the
sole source of evidence in the realm of the scientific method is, I
would argue, naive and lacking in an understanding of the philosophical
underpinnings of science."
Looking forward, I will dig a little deeper into this topic in the next week, so please check back or subscribe to Sports Are 80 Percent Mental.
Post A Comment
Join now or login to comment
If you are a sports professional and would like to promote yourself or build a network we recommend going straight to professional registration. However, if you are in a hurry you can come back to this later.

Comments
Rob Robson
iStadia - Networking for Sport & Exercise Community