Professionals register now to create your own content and profile, and gain other potential financial, networking and marketing benefits.

Consumers (athletes, enthusiasts) use our quick registration to enhance your experience of the site



Tour de France Drugs Cheats: Why do they do it?

Views: 601 | Rating: 4.0 (1 vote) | Print | | Flag

This isn't anything academic, but simply some straight-forward thoughts after I was interviewed on this topic two days ago on Sky News.
 
Tour de France leader Michael Rasmussen has been asked to leave the tour after questions over whether he failed to tell the drug testing authorities where he would be during his preparation for the Tour. It has emerged that despite telling the press for over a week that he was training in Mexico, his wife’s homeland, he was actually in Italy. Suspicion has increased as to whether he purposely deceived the testers so he could take cycle of drugs or other blood doping (e.g. EPO) during this period, and only looks worse now there is evidence that he lied.

Two other riders have tested positive this week for banned drugs and pre-Tour favourite Alexandre Vinokourov displayed traces of someone else’s blood – all three have been kicked out of the Tour. Worse still for British hopes, two entire teams have left the Tour along with their disgraced riders. So hopes of Mark Cavendish and Bradley Wiggins finishing in Paris in less than a week are over.

So why do riders take the drugs or blood dope when the risks to them and others are so high?

  1. One, we are creatures of habit. We do today what we did yesterday. We do this year what we did last year. Riders too will generally follow the same regime and take the same performance enhancing choices as they did before.
  2. Two, there is pressure to perform: From sponsors, team management, team mates, and the public/fans. Can you as a rider perform up to those expectations, live with the consequences on not performing up to those expectations, or will you give in to the temptation of taking something illegal to give you more confidence in your performance?
  3. Three, there are personal needs to be satisfied. Riders are competitive. Some have a strong need to be successful, gain glory, be seen on TV, beat a key adversary, show that their training has been worth it, that they are as good as or better than before. It’s tempting then to take something that would give you an edge – or level out the playing field if you think the other riders are ‘on something.’

How can riders ride clean?

  1. Realise that taking banned performance enhancing products is a choice, your choice, no matter what pressure may be exerted on you.
  2. Accept that the probability of getting caught is high.
  3. Accept that the consequences of getting caught are prohibitive – whether this is loss of face, embarrassment, shame, dent in income, long-term ban or whatever is severe enough to be a deterrent to you.
  4. Accept that cycling is being cleaned up and you are playing Russian Roulette if you continue to dope.
  5. Choose to be a leader in this newer healthier cycling.
  6. Have faith that the cheats will be caught.
  7. Have confidence that if your performance drops you’ll be able to absorb this and won’t be crushed by it. Your performance is important, sure, but not life and death.

Comments

Thanks Victor. Some nicely put thoughts. Especially as they don't come from the pages of an academic text!
As this year's cycling Tour de France approaches, with the exclusion of last year's winner Alberto Contador (guilty by association but who managed to win the Italian Giro) and Tom Boonen (cocaine), it is interesing to re-read this article about why riders take drugs. Commenting on the sorts of pressure experienced by Tour riders, Britain's David Millar has been eloquent on this subject, citing pressure from sponsors, team directors, managers and coaches, as well as the need to survive an arduous season, again under pressure to perform by the same people. His writing has echoed books by Richard Virenque and Philippe Gaumont (who talked of being a 'prisoner of the system') There is also the issue of a certain naive trust in doctors (several of whom have been found guilty but seem to be less severely sanctioned), and other technical staff, sometimes unqualified and unlicensed (in the case for example of masseurs). The problem is at last being seriously addressed by the Tour Organisers and others, but the long running dispute between the UCI on the one hand, and the Amoury Sports Organisation (organisers of the Tour) and the French cycling federation (suspended by the UCI) seems to result from a stupid clash of personalities and is not helping progress on a united front. However measures such as the riders' 'health passport', random testing, dramatic suspensions of whole teams and invidivual riders, plus the support of the new generation of young pro cyclists are all hopeful signs for the future. This year's Tour which is even more open than ever before should be an interesting event. Peter-Danton de ROUFFIGNAC

Peter-Danton de ROUFFIGNAC Sports Counselor
peter-danton@orange.fr http://monsite.orange.fr/sport-counseling

Post A Comment

You need to be signed into istadia.com to post comments

If you are not a member yet, registering is quick and easy! Click here for Quick Registration and keep up to date with what is happening, engage in some networking and access to iStadia’s expert community.

However if you are a sport & exercise professional or business and would like to promote yourself by building a detailed, search-engine friendly profile and posting content to attract potential clients, customers or employers, we recommend Full Registration.

Members login.

Dr Victor Thompson's Articles

November 2008
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30 

Search Dr Victor's Article